The Triad, what is it and do we need to be concerned? ( a reprint from spring of 2008)
I have been against the war in Iraq, I have questioned Bush’s and our Bi-partisan congress’ motives, I have pondered the significance of our being there, and until recently I have thought it was a big mistake. A great part of me still does. But, recently I have been looking deeper into the global reality of the Iraqi conflict and what it really means. It means we need to limit the power and control of the Middle East. It means we need to be present in an area that is unstable. It means we need to better understand the threat to the East and to the North of Iraq. We do need to be mindful of the past 40 years of unrest in Iraq, Iran and Israel and that relationship as it does indeed affect the entire world.
Recently Senator McCain was asked about the Iraqi conflict during an interview with George Stephanopolous, and my major criticism in his response is this: When he was asked about concern over political and financial growth in Russia and what does it mean to the United States and the rest of the world I was saddened that he only mentioned concern over Putin. That when he was asked simultaneously about Iran he only mentioned Russia and the instability in Iran, what I wanted him to say was that he was concerned about the Triad between Russia, Iran and China, that he would include in the conversation regarding Putin’s hand choosing of Medvedev that he would discuss Hu Jintao and Medvedev’s alliance against the placement of missiles on the Eastern front to protect European nations against Iran. Bottom line is this, and I encourage you to read on regarding my rationale on this topic. Bottom line: Who is contributing to the buildup in Russia? Who is strengthening Russia economically, politically? Who is contributing to Iran’s nuclear growth and military provision? It is not solely Russia and Iran helping the other, there is a third party, a large third party, a communist third party.
Is Russia gearing up for a fight? Is it just acting as the eastern world’s scarecrow? Why would Russia seek to act the scarecrow for Iran? What is the overall purpose of a military buildup and by what financial means is a recently struggling country able to build up a military strength?
Russia is the stopgap between the Western world and China. In order to measure the importance of Russia and its role as either scarecrow or legitimate bully, we must identify what entity is fueling its ability to stand up against the United States in either role. Are the recent investments by Russian billionaires’ (and continued investment) in the rich real estate of Colorado and the recent discussion of drilling for shale oil in the rich terrain of Colorado a coincidence?
Let’s look at Russia from a logistic, strategic point of reference. It is the provider of a logistic landmass that can protect China by land access as well a provider of the necessary nuclear commodities for Iran. Example: Russia supplies nuclear materials to Iran, Iran supplies oil (and is a leading energy source) to China, China supplies financial support to Russia, Russia builds up as a “junior power” under China, Iran becomes the dominant power in the Middle East, and China continues to consume the world’s energy resources while it continues to build up economically to become the world’s superpower. (And now there is the pipelines supplying natural gas from Syria to Iran and the Leviathan oil basin with 10% of the world's fossil fuel)
The evidence that identifies a Triad in the East including Russian, China and Iran has grown in significance. As the United States continues to trade and enable an emergence of a capitalistic mind-set for the purpose of economic growth for a few key United States investors, we begin to see an emergence of a middle class in China and India. This consumerism extends to the excessive need for precious metals and raw materials found in Russia and Africa. In order to put these materials into development an excessive amount of energy is necessary to do so. The triad of Russia, China and Iran is all a part of the “bigger” plan. That “bigger” plan is to unseat the United States, disabling it and creating an AXIS that can shut down the US. What does Capitalism look like minus democracy?
The United States as a global infant is experiencing what many believe caused the fall of Rome…a disproportionate cost to fuel ratio through "synchronous failure." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, The Upside of Down)
Not long ago Chinese President Hu Jintao and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev met to denounce jointly the US missile shield. This concerns me, as I am confused as to the mixed messages that China is sending the United States. China wants US citizen’s investment capital, US financial support and recent philanthropic support following the earthquake, but yet if feels as though we are a military threat. Russia fears our involvement in and around them logistically, all the while supporting the build-up in both China and Iran. How can we as a nation befriend and support China, at the same time that China is intimately involved with Russia and Iran?
As for this writer, I believe that Russia’s threat should be taken seriously as it has the support of its neighbors. It is clear that there cannot be a separation between Russia, Iran and China. Whether it is scarecrow tactics or straight on bullying, it should not be ignored.
What does it mean in relationship to the “end?” Well, the end will first be a systematic end to a few, then the many, then an end to all. Like dominoes there will be a starting point and then an “end” point. As China consumes mass quantities of the world’s energy resources, financially builds up Russia to the point that they are flexing military muscle and financially enables Iran to rely solely on Russia and China for its continued strengthening in the Middle East we must identify the strongest point of the Axis.